NO COVERAGE WITHOUT DIRECT PHYSICAL LOSS FROM AN EFFICIENT PROXIMATE CAUSE

131_C117

NO COVERAGE WITHOUT DIRECT PHYSICAL LOSS FROM AN EFFICIENT PROXIMATE CAUSE

Commercial Property

Direct Peril/Cause Of Loss

Covenant Of Good Faith And Fair Dealing

Physical Loss

Efficient Proximate Cause

Bad Faith

 

As a result of storms in the spring of 2005, MRI Healthcare Center of Glendale, Inc. (MHC's) landlord was required to repair the roof over the room that housed its Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machine. However, the roof repairs could not be done unless and until the MRI machine was demagnetized or "ramped down." Unfortunately, once the machine was ramped down, it failed to ramp back up. This failure purportedly constituted "damage" to the MRI machine resulting in loss of business income to MHC. Since this chain of events was set in motion by the spring storms, MHC claimed that they were the "efficient proximate cause" of the loss. Because the storms were covered under the State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm) policy issued to MHC, MHC claimed it was entitled to recover both the amount it spent to repair the machine and the loss of business income sustained while the machine was inoperable.

 

When State Farm refused to pay the claims in August 2007, MHC sued for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court denied summary judgment in favor of MHC and granted it for State Farm. MHC appealed.

 

Under Business Personal Property coverage, the State Farm policy stated it would pay for accidental direct physical loss to business personal property by an insured loss. The Loss Of Income coverage stated it would pay if the suspension during the period of restoration were caused by accidental direct physical loss to property caused by or resulting from an insured loss. A provision under Losses Not Insured stated that State Farm would pay accidental direct physical loss resulting from certain losses unless the resulting loss itself is excluded. State Farm's investigated MHC's claim for water damage from a leak in the roof in an area adjacent to the MRI area. Its investigation revealed that the leak was due to "wear, tear, deterioration and faulty workmanship" and not from a covered accidental direct physical loss.

 

On appeal, MHC argued that the trial court erred, in part, because it focused on the "wrong" event as the "proximate or efficient" cause of damage to the MRI machine and in finding that the damage was not accidental. It also asserted error in failing to recognize coverage for accidental direct physical damage resulting from certain causes of loss otherwise excluded.

 

The appellate court agreed with State Farm and held that the rainstorms were not the "direct" cause of MHC having to demagnetize the MRI machine to allow repairs to be made to the room. It determined that the MRI machine's failure to "ramp up" after being repaired was not a "physical loss." In addition, damage to the MRI machine from demagnetization was not accidental. Finally, the rainstorms were not the "efficient proximate cause" of MHC's loss.

 

Correspondingly, the same reasons for granting State Farm's motion for summary judgment supported denying MHC's. There can be no breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing unless policy benefits are due under the contract. The conclusion that a bad faith claim cannot be maintained unless policy benefits are due is in accord with the policy in which the duty of good faith is firmly rooted. That guiding principle is based on contract law and the rule that neither party will do anything that will injure the rights of the other to receive the benefits of the agreement. The trial court's judgment was affirmed.

 

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 8 (California). MRI Healthcare Center of Glendale, Inc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. State Farm General Insurance Company, Defendant and Respondent. No. B213985. Aug 4, 2010. 187 Cal.App.4th 766, 115 Cal.Rptr.3d 27